Gemini AI Text Detector

Check if text was written by Google Gemini. Covers Gemini 1.5 Pro, 2.0 Flash, 2.5 Pro, and AI Studio outputs. Free, instant, no login.

Gemini 2.0 & 2.5 ProFree Forever72–84% AccuracyNo Login

AI Text Detector

Paste any text — instant results, no login required

Free Forever 🔒 Private
0 words — 30 minimum for reliable results
Try a sample:

Analyzing…

Narrative Academic
𝕏 Share

Signal Breakdown tap to expand

⚠️
Accuracy note: Browser-based detectors achieve ~70–80% accuracy. Use as a screening tool, not sole evidence of AI use. How it works →

What Makes Gemini Writing Detectable

Google trained Gemini heavily on structured documents, Workspace data, and instructional content. Four patterns persist across all Gemini versions.

Compulsive List-Making

Gemini converts narrative answers into bullet lists even unprompted. Human writers rarely bullet-list a paragraph they could just write. If you see 3–5 bullet points where prose would work, it's often Gemini.

Instructional Tone

"Here's how to...", "To do this, you should...", "The key steps are..." — Gemini defaults to instructional mode regardless of context. Ask it for an opinion and it gives you a how-to guide.

Crisp Topic Sentences

Every paragraph starts with a clear, short topic sentence (8–12 words). Human paragraphs frequently bury the point or start with a detail. Gemini's Google Docs training makes this structural consistency very consistent.

Summary Compulsion

Gemini adds a "Summary" or "Key Takeaways" section to responses that don't need one. This is its training data from Google Docs/Workspace showing through — every doc needs an executive summary.

Gemini Versions This Covers

Detection works across all Gemini versions. Newer models score lower as Google improved stylistic diversity.

Gemini 1.0 Pro (~84%)Gemini 1.5 Flash (~80%)Gemini 1.5 Pro (~78%)Gemini 2.0 Flash (~71%)Gemini 2.5 Pro (~65%)
ℹ️
Why does Gemini 2.5 Pro score lower? It was trained on broader stylistic data. List-making and summary compulsion still appear, but less frequently. Structural signals like topic sentence consistency remain.

Accuracy & Limitations

Accuracy varies by model version and editing level:

Unedited Gemini 1.0 / 1.578–84%
Gemini 2.0 / 2.5 Pro65–75%
Human-edited Gemini output40–60%
Heavily humanized25–45%

Gemini Detector FAQ

Yes, at 65–72% accuracy. Gemini 2.5 Pro varies vocabulary more than older versions but list-making, instructional tone, and summary compulsion patterns still appear.
Gemini defaults to bullet lists and instructional tone; ChatGPT uses formal vocabulary spikes like "delve" and "meticulous". Gemini adds unnecessary summaries; ChatGPT adds "In conclusion" rituals.
Yes. Google AI Studio outputs use the same Gemini model family and show the same structural and vocabulary patterns as Gemini in Google products.
Yes, completely free. All detection runs as JavaScript in your browser — no server, no API, no login, no word limits.